These discussions regarding Socrates situation, are universal, and can be applied to concepts and theories throughout any range of time, when dealing with morally important topics.
Or will you go to them without shame, and talk to them, Socrates. Leaving and breaking the law, would in fact make him guilty of the charges set against him. After all, Socrates is not concerned with what he must do in order to live, but what he must do in order to live well--that is, honorably and justly.
Nay; but if they who call themselves friends are truly friends, they surely will. So even in retaliation, it is wrong to inflict an injury upon someone who has wronged you, since inflicting injury is a form of injustice.
Tell me, then, whether I am right in saying that some opinions, and the opinions of some men only, are to be valued, and other opinions, and the opinions of other men, are not to be valued.
Crito is overwhelmed with emotion with the impending loss of his friend, and is attempting to passionately convince Socrates to run away and avoid his sentence set upon him by the court.
Again, Crito maintains that it is proper and right to return evil for evil. And will you, O professor of true virtue, say that you are justified in this. Say whether you have any objection to urge against those of us who regulate marriage.
Crito insists that he will not get into much trouble as a result of having helped Socrates escape, for those who would inform against him are cheaply bought. Also, Socrates should not worry about the risk or the financial cost to his friends; these they are willing to pay, and they have also arranged to find Socrates a pleasant life in exile.
Also, Socrates should not worry about the risk or the financial cost to his friends; these they are willing to pay, and they have also arranged to find Socrates a pleasant life in exile. Socrates is convinced they are wrong in holding that opinion, and he proceeds at some length to set forth his reasons for rejecting the view that they have presented.
Socrates asks Crito to consider for a moment what the officials of the government might say to him under the existing circumstances. He was beginning to grow cold about the groin, when he uncovered his face, for he had covered himself up, and said they were his last words -he said: But the truth is, that they can do neither good nor evil: On the other hand, if he refuses to escape from prison and abides by the execution of the sentence pronounced upon him, he will have a good defense when he stands before the tribunal of the judgment of the dead.
The first duty, is to always obey laws when they are just. He feels that an unjust action against the State, would do more harm to himself and the State, than any good that could come of it. He is visited before dawn by his old friend Crito, who has made arrangements to smuggle Socrates out of prison to the safety of exile.
A number of possible inconsistencies raise themselves in this section though the most important ones are raised later, in the speech of the Laws of Athens. A quite different view was held by those who believed that the proper function of punishment was to enable society to get even with the criminal by inflicting upon him an evil that was equivalent to the one he had caused others to suffer.
Why do you say this. If they do abide by it, they must admit that it would be wrong for Socrates to heed the advice of Crito by trying to escape from prison. Then why did you sit and say nothing, instead of awakening me at once. But now, since the argument has thus far prevailed, the only question which remains to be considered is, whether we shall do rightly either in escaping or in suffering others to aid in our escape and paying them in money and thanks, or whether we shan not do rightly; and if the latter, then death or any other calamity which may ensue on my remaining here must not be allowed to enter into the calculation.
Someone who disobeys or ignores the advice of his doctor will surely suffer, and his body will deteriorate. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a parent, and so to go against the Laws would be like striking a parent. So even in retaliation, it is wrong to inflict an injury upon someone who has wronged you, since inflicting injury is a form of injustice.
Therefore, he will not forsake the principles that he has honored for a long time but will remain true to whatever reason tells him is demanded by them. Response Paper: The Crito Socrates argues in the Crito that he shouldn't escape his death sentence because it isn't just.
Crito and friends can provide the ransom the warden demands. If not for himself, Socrates should escape for the sake of his friends, sons, and those who benefit from his teaching.
A Critique of the Crito and an Argument for Philosophical Anarchism by Forrest Cameranesi In this essay I will present a summary and critique of Plato’s dialogue Crito, focusing especially on Socrates’ arguments in favor of his obligatory obedience to the Athenian state’s death sentence.
In the Crito, particular attention is given to the reasons advanced by Socrates for refusing to escape from prison as a means of saving his own life.
The circumstances were such that he might easily have done so, and his friends were urging him to do it. Crito should not worry about how his, Socrates', or others' reputations may fare in the general esteem: they should only concern themselves with behaving well.
The only question at hand is whether or not it would be just for Socrates to attempt an escape. Crito (/ ˈ k r aɪ t oʊ / KRY-toh or / ˈ k r iː t oʊ / KREE-toh; Ancient Greek: Κρίτων) is a dialogue by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. It depicts a conversation between Socrates and his wealthy friend Crito regarding justice (δικαιοσύνη), injustice (ἀδικία), and the appropriate response to injustice.
Socrates' Response. Socrates replies that Crito should not worry about how he is viewed by others. He should focus instead on living the right way. Plato's 'Crito': Summary & Concepts Related.The crito a response